According to Information Week article on the study:
--Clinical engagement. Researchers' examination of 13
registries in five countries revealed that improvement in health
outcomes are most effective when clinicians themselves are responsible
for collecting and interpreting data and when clinicians lead the charge
in clinical improvement.
--National infrastructure. A nationwide infrastructure
must comprise common standards for tracking diagnoses, treatments,
outcomes, and costs at the patient level as well as a limited number of
shared IT platforms and a common legal framework within which to
regulate the use of patient data.
--High-quality data. The most effective way to collect
relevant data is through disease registries that track groups of
patients' health outcomes who have the same diagnosis or who have
undergone the same medical procedure. By analyzing the data, providers
and payers can identify, codify, and promote more effective treatment
protocols and enhance cost-effective care.
--Outcome-based incentives. The healthcare industry
must use outcome data to drive incentives in the healthcare system. The
data-driven incentive measures should spur changes in the way clinicians
practice, payers reimburse, and suppliers of drugs and medical devices
develop and deliver products and services.
The US has mixed results when it came to disease registries -- some being amongst the best, while others sorely lacking in data. The study praised efforts by Kaiser Permanente and Intermoutain Healthcare for their efforts patient outcomes amongst their members and providing incentives to physicians to use best practices based on outcomes-research.
In another related story Kaiser Permanente has launched a health exchange pilot with the Social Security Administration to fast track disability claims and processing. The large-scale pilot is the first of its kind to use the Nationwide Health information exchange to transmit/exchange patient records.
No comments:
Post a Comment